by J.M. Rodgers Co. | Aug 26, 2022
Client A major American chemical company and large importer and exporter of petrochemicals. Challenge The client had an existing drawback program to recover duties paid with another duty drawback broker. However, they believed their program was not functioning at the...
by J.M. Rodgers Co. | Aug 13, 2022
Client Aerospace division of a multinational corporation specializing in repairs Challenge A potential customer approached J.M. Rodgers about filing for duty drawback. They were importing aerospace parts duty-paid, repairing them, then exporting them. The bulk of...
by J.M. Rodgers Co. | Jul 12, 2022
Client Vacuum cleaner and floor care product manufacturing company. Challenge In 2018, the US imposed additional tariffs on certain imports from China, known as Section 301 tariffs. The US Trade Representative’s office implemented a tariff exclusion process to...
by J.M. Rodgers Co. | Jul 12, 2022
Client A leading supplier of graphite products and carbon additives throughout North America. Challenge An importer of more than $25 million in goods annually with a significant export customer base was hit with substantial “section 301” duties following their...
by J.M. Rodgers Co. | May 5, 2022
Client A European manufacturer and installer of huge-scale wind farms and turbines. Challenge After being introduced to the concept of duty drawback, the customer held a formal bidding process for drawback services. Ultimately, their management team opted to set the...
